<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><br><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>I made short tests with glusterfs and bonding, but I have performance issues.</div><div><br></div><div>Environment:</div><div><br></div><div>- bonding mode=4 (with switch support) or mode=6 </div><div>- centos7</div><div>- vlans</div><div>- two servers with 4 nic/node, one nic on the internet (this is the default route) and 3 nic as bonded interface</div><div>- MTU 9000 on all interface (bondings, vlans, eths, etc), MTU 9216 on the switch ports</div><div>- each host vlan-s can ping each host on the vlan subnets and on the non vlan subnets.</div><div>- the volume uses the bonded vlans as bricks</div><div><br></div><div><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">[root@node1 lock]# gluster vol info<br> <br>Volume Name: meta<br>Type: Replicate<br>Volume ID: f4d026e7-3edd-442f-9207-f0a849acebf5<br>Status: Started<br>Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2<br>Transport-type: tcp<br>Bricks:<br>Brick1: gs00.itsmart.cloud:/gluster/meta0<br>Brick2: gs01.itsmart.cloud:/gluster/meta1</p></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I did this test:</div><div></div><div><br></div><div><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">[root@node0 lock]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/lock/disk bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync<br>1000+0 records in<br>1000+0 records out<br>1048576000 bytes (1,0 GB) copied, 10,3035 s, 102 MB/s</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">I compared with local hdd speed tests:</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">[root@node0 lock]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/disk bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync<br>1000+0 records in<br>1000+0 records out<br>1048576000 bytes (1,0 GB) copied, 3,04411 s, 344 MB/s</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">Ok, I mean this is a network based solution, but I think the 100MB/sec is possible with one nic too.</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">I just wondering, maybe my bonding isn't working fine. </p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">What do you think, is it ok? </p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">The port utilization is minimal, there are two bigger traffic on two ports only.</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">Thanks in advance.</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;">Tibor</p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px;"><br></p></div></div></body></html>