<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Bryan Whitehead <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:driver@megahappy.net" target="_blank">driver@megahappy.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm using 40G Infiniband with IPoIB for gluster. Here are some ping<br>
times (from host 172.16.1.10):<br><br>
--- 172.16.1.11 ping statistics ---<br>
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms<br>
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.093/0.142/0.198/0.035 ms</blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Interesting, you have a lower min and slightly lower avg, but your max is actually higher then I am seeing on my 10 gig setup, since Gluster FS uses a lot of small packets, it does not look like it is worth upgrading from 10 to 40 gig ethernet...</div>
<div style><br></div><div style><div>--- <a href="http://virt1.exarionetworks.com">virt1.exarionetworks.com</a> ping statistics ---</div><div>10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms</div><div>rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.112/0.163/0.191/0.027 ms</div>
<div><br></div><div style>Also note, that I am running 10GBase-T, if I was running over fiber, I would think my overall numbers would be lower then your 40 gig Infiniband, how can that be? <br></div><div><br></div></div>
</div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">><><br>Nathan Stratton Founder, CTO Exario Networks, Inc.<br>nathan at <a href="http://robotics.net" target="_blank">robotics.net</a> nathan at <a href="http://exarionetworks.com" target="_blank">exarionetworks.com</a><div>
<a href="http://www.robotics.net" target="_blank">http://www.robotics.net</a> <a href="http://www.exarionetworks.com/" target="_blank">http://www.exarionetworks.com/</a><br><div><br></div>
<div>Building the WebRTC solutions today that your customers will demand tomorrow.<br></div></div></div>
</div></div>