<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><br>On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Michael Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael@netdirect.ca" target="_blank">michael@netdirect.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Yes, actually.<br>
<br>
Are you running with ext4 bricks?<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>yes<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>
<br>
<a href="http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-bit-by-ext4-structure-change/" target="_blank">http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-bit-by-ext4-structure-change/</a><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>and I just did upgrade to 2.6.32-279.22.1 on the bricks.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div>
<br>
If so, try disabling dir_index on the ext4 filesystems and
remounting them.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Does this force ext4 to return 32 bit hash values, i.e. have the same effect has downgrading the kernel to pre 2.6.32-268.el6 ?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Sabuj<br></div>
</div></div></div>