<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Dec 27, 2012 9:10 PM, "Stephan von Krawczynski" <<a href="mailto:skraw@ithnet.com">skraw@ithnet.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Sorry, JM forgive my ignorance, but it simply does not match up what you say.<br>
> First you say:<br>
><br>
> "In general, I don't recommend any distributed filesystems for VM images, but<br>
> I can also see that this is the wave of the future. <br>
><br>
> Which means you do not believe at all in one major goal of this fs. Hu?</p>
<p dir="ltr">I meant as they're implemented now, which will change in the future. Obviously, I hope we get there.</p>
<p dir="ltr">-JM<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">> And then:<br>
><br>
> "I am sorry that you haven't been able to deploy glusterfs in production.<br>
> Discussing how and why glusterfs works - or doesn't work - for particular use<br>
> cases is welcome on this list. Starting off a discussion about how the entire<br>
> approach is unworkable is kind of counter-productive and not exactly helpful<br>
> to those of us who just want to use the thing."<br>
><br>
> Now how can you expect a "productive" input to a question where you yourself<br>
> do not believe in an answer being possible at all.<br>
> I mean, you expect it to fail anyway but nevertheless want people to spend<br>
> their time? Most of us are _not_ paid for debugging glusterfs. Are you<br>
> paid for it? And you do not believe in the project anyway (you said so above)?<br>
> I am astonished ...<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Stephan<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > Sean Fulton <<a href="mailto:sean@gcnpublishing.com">sean@gcnpublishing.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > I didn't think his message violated any of your rules. Seems to me he<br>
> > has some disagreements with the approach being used to develop Gluster.<br>
> > I think you should listen to people who disagree with you.<br>
> ><br>
> > From monitoring this list for more than a year and<br>
> > tried--unsuccessfully--to put Gluster into production use, I think there<br>
> > are a lot of people who have problems with stability.<br>
> ><br>
> > So please, can you respond to his comments with why his suggestions are<br>
> > invalid?<br>
> ><br>
> > sean<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 12/27/2012 03:39 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Stephan,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I'm going to make this as simple as possible. Every message to this<br>
> > > list should follow these rules:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > 1. be helpful<br>
> > > 2. be constructive<br>
> > > 3. be respectful<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I will not tolerate ranting that serves no purpose. If your message<br>
> > > doesn't follow any of the rules above, then you shouldn't be posting it.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > This is your 2nd warning.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > -JM<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > Gluster-users mailing list<br>
> > > <a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
> > > <a href="http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users">http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > Sean Fulton<br>
> > GCN Publishing, Inc.<br>
> > Internet Design, Development and Consulting For Today's Media Companies<br>
> > <a href="http://www.gcnpublishing.com">http://www.gcnpublishing.com</a><br>
> > (203) 665-6211, x203<br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Gluster-users mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
> > <a href="http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users">http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Gluster-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users">http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</p>