<div class="gmail_extra"><pre style="word-wrap:break-word;white-space:pre-wrap">2012/4/25 Brian Candler <<a href="mailto:B.Candler@pobox.com">B.Candler@pobox.com</a>>
>
> Personally I wouldn't, but it's your choice. In my opinion LVM adds another
> complexity layer, more stuff to manage, and you will need to keep the sizes
> of the various logical volumes in sync (whether you are distributed or
> replicated), and grow your XFS filesystems whenever you grow the logical
> volumes.
You are right.
> But if you need that level of control, it's fine.
>
So, what do you suggest? A simple RAID10?</pre><pre style="word-wrap:break-word;white-space:pre-wrap">I have servers with 8 SATA disk, what do you suggest to 'merge' these disks to a bigger volume?</pre><pre style="word-wrap:break-word;white-space:pre-wrap">
I think that having "du" output wrong, is not a good solution.</pre></div>