I'd try putting all hostnames in /etc/hosts. Also, can you post ping times between each host ?<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Harald Hannelius <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:harald.hannelius@arcada.fi">harald.hannelius@arcada.fi</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Brian Candler wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:25:18PM +0200, Harald Hannelius wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I'll have to test with just a two-way replica, and see if I get<br>
better performance out of that. I'm gonna loose the capability to<br>
have one node at the other site then<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ah... are these nodes separated by a WAN? Synchronous replication is pretty<br>
sensitive to latency. You might want to look at geo-replication instead<br>
(which I've not tested)<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No, it's a 1 Gbps LAN. The other "site" is within LAN-range.<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Harald Hannelius | harald.hannelius/a\<a href="http://arcada.fi" target="_blank">arcada.fi</a> | <a href="tel:%2B358%2050%20594%201020" value="+358505941020" target="_blank">+358 50 594 1020</a><br></div><div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" target="_blank">http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>