<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I believe we mount without as we specifically do not use acls. I will ask a colleaque to follow up</div><div><br></div><div><br>On Aug 13, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Anand Avati <<a href="mailto:anand.avati@gmail.com">anand.avati@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Dipeit <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dipeit@gmail.com"><a href="mailto:dipeit@gmail.com">dipeit@gmail.com</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
We noticed this bug too using the gluster client. I'm surprised that not more people noticed this lack of posix compliance. This makes gluster really unusable in multiuser environments. Is that because gluster is mostly used in large web farms like pandora?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>GlusterFS is POSIX compliant w.r.t user groups. We have not seen this issue in our testing. Can you give more info about your setup? Have you mounted with -o acl or without? Anything unusual in the logs?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Avati</div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>