Hi John,<br><br>Please find the comments inline.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, John Simmonds <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:John2.Simmonds@uwe.ac.uk">John2.Simmonds@uwe.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hello,<br>
<br>
Why is the trash can translator best utilized on the server rather than<br>
the client?<br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
<br>
I am just thinking about it from a distributed replicated point of view.<br>
If I am replicated and distributing at the client side I don't<br>
understand what would happen if I used the trash can on each volume on<br>
the server side rather than just placing it on the client side using the<br>
final replicated and distributed volume.</blockquote><div><br>with distribute, trash should be loaded on client.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
John Simmonds<br>
<br>
<br>
This email was independently scanned for viruses by McAfee anti-virus software and none were found<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" target="_blank">http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Raghavendra G<br><br>