<html><body><div style="font-family: lucida console,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><br></div><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for confirming the presence and reasons for 1 IP address - that's what I would expect to see.<br></div><div><br></div><div>The system in question is an internal red hat cluster - that we're trying to understand, since it's tripping up gstatus :)<br></div><div><br></div><div>a gluster peer status for an 8 node cluster is returning **2** nodes as IP addresses<br></div><div><br></div><div>redhat-storage-server-2.1.1.0-6.el6rhs.noarch<br>glusterfs-server-3.4.0.44rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64</div><div><br></div><div>What I wanted to understand was whether there is something 'obvious' to explain the IP adddresses.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Since there isn't - I'll get the sysadmin to raise a BZ, and post the BZ to the list.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,<br></div><div><br></div><div>PC<br></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Kaushal M" <kshlmster@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Paul Cuzner" <pcuzner@redhat.com><br><b>Cc: </b>"Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, 28 May, 2014 5:49:10 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Gluster-devel] IP addresses in peer status/pool list<br><div><br></div>This is surprising. There hasn't been any change that could cause this<br>kind of behaviour AFAICT.<br><div><br></div>Normally, the peer from which the probes were performed would be shown<br>using IPs on the other nodes. But if a reverse probe with hostnames<br>should fix this too.<br><div><br></div>Could you share more information on your setup (version, logs, etc)?<br><div><br></div>~kaushal<br><div><br></div>On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Paul Cuzner <pcuzner@redhat.com> wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>><br>> Can anyone shed any light on why I see IP addresses in peer status or pool<br>> list output instead of names?<br>><br>> In clusters where the names were used in the probes, and volumes built with<br>> node names I see IP's in the peer status output?<br>><br>> This has been the case for a while - I just like to understand why?<br>><br>> I've even seen some output where 2 nodes are listed by IP instead of names..<br>><br>> Cheers,<br>><br>> Paul C<br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Gluster-devel mailing list<br>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org<br>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel<br>><br></blockquote><div><br></div></div></body></html>