<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hi List,<br></div><div><br></div><div>In GlusterFS codebase, strcpy() calls have been used in many places. IMO, if we can replace strcpy calls with memcpy() we would get a performance bonus as memcpy directly interacts with memory area. I am posting this suggestion based on my earlier project experience where we have seen a significant difference of performance with this replace.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Please feel free to add if you think otherwise.<br></div><div><br></div><div><span name="x"></span><div>Regards,<br>Atin Mukherjee<br>Senior Software Engineer<br>E-9, Extn : 73196, Direct : 08039245196, Mobile: +919739491377</div><div>Email - amukherj@redhat.com<br></div><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: small;" data-mce-style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: small;"><img src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5cf9316a4b&view=att&th=1410c09322ad5849&attid=0.1.1&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1" data-mce-src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5cf9316a4b&view=att&th=1410c09322ad5849&attid=0.1.1&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1" height="53" width="163"></span></div><span name="x"></span><br></div></div></body></html>