<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09.01.2014 04:15, Justin Clift
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20140109091551.ae39a455831f7c682e777744@gluster.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Ahhh, this is probably due to the updated OpenSSL stuff in EL 6.5.</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes...<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20140109091551.ae39a455831f7c682e777744@gluster.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Maybe we need to do separate sets of RPMs for EL 6.0-6.4, and
a different set for 6.5 onwards.</pre>
</blockquote>
It would seem, this is how things were done with the previous
release (3.4.1-2). I wonder, what changed -- and whether it can be
undone or otherwise corrected...<br>
<br>
It is certainly disappointing to download RPMs from<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.2/RHEL/epel-6.4/x86_64/">http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.2/RHEL/epel-6.4/x86_64/</a><br>
<br>
and see them fail to install on RHEL-6.4 -- because they were, in
fact, neither made on RHEL-6.4, nor tested on RHEL-6.4 :-(<br>
<blockquote>-mi<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>