<div dir="ltr">No, I see issues reported in <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967</a> which is probably related to BZ#991035.</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vbellur@redhat.com" target="_blank">vbellur@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Lukáš Bezdička wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_<u></u>64 issue with ACL is still<br>
there, unless one applies patch from <a href="http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/" target="_blank">http://review.gluster.org/#/c/<u></u>5693/</a><br>
which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets<br>
entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because ACL<br>
mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm no C<br>
expert to say so :(<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Vijay<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>