<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Gustavo Bervian Brand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gugabrand@gmail.com" target="_blank">gugabrand@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div> </div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The frame which you used for doing the STACK_WIND(create) was probably unwound by the time the create_cbk came back from the server? This is the most common/likely cause..<div>
<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div> You mean that the frame of readv/readv_cbk (where I'm calling the WIND to create/open) is already gone, even if there was no UNWIND yet? </div><div> If this is the case, how can I avoid that? I am doing a STACK_WIND(create or open) by the end of the readv_cbk, I tried increase the refcount of the frame, but there was no effect.</div>
<div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So you are using the frame pointer in readv_cbk to do the STACK_WIND of create or open. But are you sure you are not unwinding the same frame right after the STACK_WIND? </div>
</div>