Hello,<div><br></div><div> Some days ago when I mentioned I was using syncop_*() calls and Avati asked if I was triggering them from a synctask worker.</div><div> </div><div> By what I can see the synctask_new will create a new thread each time, so if want a real syncronous execution from within a sequence of readv calls, creating a synctask at each readv doesn't seem a good way to go because the order of execution of these threads is not guaranteed to be sequential.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div> So, my question is why the syncop calls wouldn't be ok to be executed outside a synctask worker in this scenario (or any other)? </div><div> I didn't find any documentation about this, so that's why I am asking.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance,<br>Gustavo Bervian Brand<br>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</div>