<br>
<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br> I wish I could experience a bug. (^;<br> I'm unable to even build the software on Solaris 10 Sparc.</blockquote>
<div><br>
We just had commits yesterday in the 1.4.x branch to fix build issues
on Solaris. Though that thread has not been responded actively on the
mailing list, the issue sure is being addressed. Lack of a solaris
machine in our labs is partially the reason for the delay.<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I've seen a lot of software in production environments but when<br> a product has issues just compiling we usually don't put it on<br>
our short-list of potential solutions.<br> <br> I had some hope when I first found gluster and saw there was<br> activity. But it seems with the commercial leaning of the product<br> that priorities are shifting. I've seen it in lots of other<br>
projects. Just an observation, not making a morality or ethic<br> call.</blockquote><div><br>
As a member of the development team, I would like to assure you that
there has been no commercial leaning of the product. GlusterFS has been
a GPL (v3) project and will continue to remain so. We value the
feedback and bug reports from the community just as much as from
anybody else, if not more. Lot of the features and decisions already
have been driven by the community requirements.<br>
<br>
avati<br>
</div><br></div>